Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 54(3): 661-669, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1296955

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for COVID-19 infection and mortality and to document if any relation exists between 25 (OH) Vitamin D and COVID-19 infection. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 151 HD patients. Patients infected with COVID-19 were compared to patients without the infection. Risk factors for intensive care unit (ICU) stay and mortality were analyzed. Deceased infected patients were also compared to patients who died due to other causes. RESULTS: The mean age of all HD patients was 57.15 ± 15.73 years and 51.7% were male. The mean 25 (OH) Vitamin D level of all patients was 16.48 ± 8.45 ng/ml. Thirty-five infected patients were significantly older, had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score. They also had a higher number of patients with diabetic nephropathy, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and coronary heart disease (CHD). Patients who needed to stay in ICU had higher CCI score, a higher number of patients with diabetic nephropathy, pulmonary diseases and had statistically significantly higher CRP levels. Deceased infected patients were significantly older, had higher CCI scores and lower PTH than survived infected patients. Deceased infected patients had lower PTH, but had significantly lower leukocyte, lymphocyte counts and urea levels at admission when compared to patients who died due to other causes. Patients with poor prognosis had lower neutrophil and lymphocyte counts before infection and at admission; respectively. 25 (OH) Vitamin D level was not related to the risk of COVID-19 infection, ICU stay or mortality. CONCLUSION: Older age, higher CCI scores, diabetic nephropathy, CHD, CVA, pulmonary diseases, and lower neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were found as poor prognostic factors. The comparisons yielded no significant finding for 25 (OH) Vitamin D, acetylsalicylic acid, erythropoietin, intravenous iron, ACEI, ARBs, and dialysis adequacy parameters.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Renal Dialysis/methods , Vitamin D/blood , Age Factors , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Kidney Failure, Chronic/blood , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Multiple Chronic Conditions/epidemiology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Turkey/epidemiology
3.
Soc Work Health Care ; 60(2): 197-207, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1152955

ABSTRACT

Covid-19 has profoundly impacted social work and has exposed the existing inequities in the health care system in the United States. Social workers play a critical role in the pandemic response for historically marginalized communities and for those who find themselves needing support for the first time. Innovative approaches to care management, including the Center for Health and Social Care Integration (CHaSCI) Bridge Model of transitional care provides a foundation from which social workers can rise to meet these new challenges.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Multiple Chronic Conditions/epidemiology , Patient Care Management/organization & administration , Social Work/organization & administration , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Interinstitutional Relations , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Pandemics , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , Self-Management , Telemedicine/organization & administration , United States/epidemiology
4.
Front Public Health ; 8: 584408, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1088922

ABSTRACT

While most of the studies to date demonstrate the deleterious effect of multiple chronic diseases on COVID-19 risk and outcome, there is sparse information available on the effect of the pandemic on multimorbidity management, with no reports yet from India. We sought to explore the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on routine and emergency care for multimorbidity among community-dwelling adults in Odisha, India. A community-based cross-sectional study was undertaken pandemic lockdown, in Khurda district of Odisha, India. Around 600 individuals having at least one chronic disease residing in rural, urban residential and slums were interviewed using a specifically developed questionnaire MAQ COVID-19. The association of socio-demographic characteristics and multimorbidity with pandemic-related care challenges was examined by multiple logistic regression. Principal Component Analysis was employed to minimize the dimensionality of factors related to multimorbidity care. Multimorbidity was highly prevalent in younger age group (46-60 years) with cardio-metabolic clusters being dominant. Individuals with multimorbidity experienced significantly higher care challenges than those with single condition (AOR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.01-2.05) with notable disruption in treatment and routine check-up. Most frequently cited concerns were-physician consultation (43%), diagnostic-services (26%), transport (33%), and mobility restrictions (21%). Multivariate analysis revealed older adults living alone in urban residence to have higher challenges than their rural counterparts. Patient activation for self-care, multimorbidity literacy, and technology-enabled tele-consultation could be explored as potential interventions. Future studies should qualitatively explore the challenges of physicians as well as garner an in-depth understanding of multimorbidity management in the vulnerable subgroups.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Multimorbidity , Multiple Chronic Conditions/therapy , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , India/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Multiple Chronic Conditions/epidemiology , Multiple Chronic Conditions/psychology , Multivariate Analysis , Principal Component Analysis , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Br J Gen Pract ; 70(699): e696-e704, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-749112

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The first wave of the London COVID-19 epidemic peaked in April 2020. Attention initially focused on severe presentations, intensive care capacity, and the timely supply of equipment. While general practice has seen a rapid uptake of technology to allow for virtual consultations, little is known about the pattern of suspected COVID-19 presentations in primary care. AIM: To quantify the prevalence and time course of clinically suspected COVID-19 presenting to general practices, to report the risk of suspected COVID-19 by ethnic group, and to identify whether differences by ethnicity can be explained by clinical data in the GP record. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study using anonymised data from the primary care records of approximately 1.2 million adults registered with 157 practices in four adjacent east London clinical commissioning groups. The study population includes 55% of people from ethnic minorities and is in the top decile of social deprivation in England. METHOD: Suspected COVID-19 cases were identified clinically and recorded using SNOMED codes. Explanatory variables included age, sex, self-reported ethnicity, and measures of social deprivation. Clinical factors included data on 16 long-term conditions, body mass index, and smoking status. RESULTS: GPs recorded 8985 suspected COVID-19 cases between 10 February and 30 April 2020.Univariate analysis showed a two-fold increase in the odds of suspected COVID-19 for South Asian and black adults compared with white adults. In a fully adjusted analysis that included clinical factors, South Asian patients had nearly twice the odds of suspected infection (odds ratio [OR] = 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.83 to 2.04). The OR for black patients was 1.47 (95% CI = 1.38 to 1.57). CONCLUSION: Using data from GP records, black and South Asian ethnicity remain as predictors of suspected COVID-19, with levels of risk similar to hospital admission reports. Further understanding of these differences requires social and occupational data.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , General Practice/methods , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/ethnology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Health Status Disparities , Humans , London/epidemiology , Male , Medical Records, Problem-Oriented/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Minority Health/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Chronic Conditions/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/ethnology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 32(9): 1883-1888, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-639413

ABSTRACT

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to a dramatic crisis of Health Care Systems worldwide, and older people have been among the most disadvantaged. Specific recommendations and reports have been released both at International and National level, regarding the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 in the elderly. However, little has been proposed for an appropriate response to older, frail and multimorbid patients in different settings of care (acute care units, long term care facilities, nursing homes and primary care) and for the management of geriatric syndromes (i.e. delirium, sarcopenia, falls). We presume that the current pandemic of will leads to substantial changes in health care systems, and we suggest some key guide principles that could inspire the provision of healthcare services to older people and their families. These principles are primarily directed to physicians and nurses working in the geriatric field but could also be useful for other specialists.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Health Services for the Aged , Pandemics , Patient Care Management/methods , Pneumonia, Viral , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Aged , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Health Services for the Aged/organization & administration , Health Services for the Aged/standards , Health Services for the Aged/trends , Humans , Multiple Chronic Conditions/epidemiology , Multiple Chronic Conditions/therapy , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , SARS-CoV-2
10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(7): e2014549, 2020 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-635864

ABSTRACT

Importance: The ability to identify patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the prehospital emergency setting could inform strategies for infection control and use of personal protective equipment. However, little is known about the presentation of patients with COVID-19 requiring emergency care, particularly those who used 911 emergency medical services (EMS). Objective: To describe patient characteristics and prehospital presentation of patients with COVID-19 cared for by EMS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included 124 patients who required 911 EMS care for COVID-19 in King County, Washington, a large metropolitan region covering 2300 square miles with 2.2 million residents in urban, suburban, and rural areas, between February 1, 2020, and March 18, 2020. Exposures: COVID-19 was diagnosed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from nasopharyngeal swabs. Test results were available a median (interquartile range) of 5 (3-9) days after the EMS encounter. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence of clinical characteristics, symptoms, examination signs, and EMS impression and care. Results: Of the 775 confirmed COVID-19 cases in King County, EMS responded to 124 (16.0%), with a total of 147 unique 911 encounters. The mean (SD) age was 75.7 (13.2) years, 66 patients (53.2%) were women, 47 patients (37.9%) had 3 or more chronic health conditions, and 57 patients (46.0%) resided in a long-term care facility. Based on EMS evaluation, 43 of 147 encounters (29.3%) had no symptoms of fever, cough, or shortness of breath. Based on individual examination findings, fever, tachypnea, or hypoxia were only present in a limited portion of cases, as follows: 43 of 84 encounters (51.2%), 42 of 131 (32.1%), and 60 of 112 (53.6%), respectively. Advanced care was typically not required, although in 24 encounters (16.3%), patients received care associated with aerosol-generating procedures. As of June 1, 2020, mortality among the study cohort was 52.4% (65 patients). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that screening based on conventional COVID-19 symptoms or corresponding examination findings of febrile respiratory illness may not possess the necessary sensitivity for early diagnostic suspicion, at least in the prehospital emergency setting. The findings have potential implications for early identification of COVID-19 and effective strategies to mitigate infectious risk during emergency care.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Cough/epidemiology , Dyspnea/epidemiology , Emergency Medical Services , Fever/epidemiology , Hypoxia/epidemiology , Multiple Chronic Conditions/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Tachypnea/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Cohort Studies , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Female , Humans , Long-Term Care , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Respiratory Therapy , Retrospective Studies , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2 , Washington/epidemiology
11.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 87(7): 384-388, 2020 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-186659

ABSTRACT

Information about the clinical presentation and course of COVID-19 is evolving rapidly. On presentation, cough and fever predominate, but extrapulmonary symptoms are also common; in some patients, loss of sense of smell may be an early but favorable sign. The mortality rate varies widely in different reports but should become clearer as more data are collected. Risk factors for severe disease and death include comorbid conditions such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Other implicated factors include older age, obesity, end-stage renal disease, and a higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Multiple Organ Failure , Pneumonia, Viral , Symptom Assessment/methods , COVID-19 , Clinical Deterioration , Comorbidity , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Humans , Mortality , Multiple Chronic Conditions/epidemiology , Multiple Organ Failure/diagnosis , Multiple Organ Failure/etiology , Multiple Organ Failure/mortality , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/etiology , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Prognosis , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Survival Analysis , Symptom Assessment/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL